WORKSHOP KARYA ILMIAH DENGAN PENGUATAN REFERENSI DAN BIBLIOMETRIK PADA SISWA MTS AL-MU’MIN MUHAMMADIYAH TEMBARAK

Authors

  • Annisa Aulia Savitri Prodi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Ridho Prasetyo Prodi Kimia, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Gavriel Fauzan Faturachman Prodi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Sausan Salsabila Khusna Prodi Kimia, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Aditya Arya Dewantara Prodi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Matheus Prayoga Claus Prodi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Rizza Fauziah Prodi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Nurhaliza Yanuarti Prodi Kimia, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Izzati Amelia Putri Prodi Kimia, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Naufal Erlang Fawwaz Prodi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Devi Rambu Prianita Prodi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/abdiinsani.v12i11.3101

Keywords:

Community Service, Scientific literacy, Scientific Writing

Abstract

This community service program was carried out in May 2025, involving 62 students from grades X, XI, and XII. The activity was initiated in response to the low level of scientific literacy among students at MTs Al-Mu’min Muhammadiyah Tembarak, particularly in the areas of data analysis, scientific writing structure, and the use of credible reference sources. The problems addressed in this program include improving students’ conceptual understanding of scientific writing and strengthening their practical skills in producing academic work that adheres to scientific standards. The purpose of the activity was to equip students with essential knowledge, technical writing skills, and the ability to utilize supporting technologies through systematic training and direct mentoring. The methods employed consisted of initial observation, interactive workshop sessions, two-way discussions, practical tasks in developing outlines and abstracts, and evaluation using questionnaires and Likert-scale surveys. The results indicated a meaningful improvement in students’ understanding, reflected by achievement levels of 100% for basic scientific writing concepts, 91.9% for reference and writing conventions, 87.1% for technology utilization, and 74.2% for writing structure. The activity evaluation also showed predominantly positive responses in the agree to strongly agree categories, ranging from 38.7% to 66.1%. These findings demonstrate that the implemented training approach effectively enhanced both the conceptual and practical abilities of the students. In conclusion, the program successfully improved students’ scientific literacy and writing skills. Suggestions for future activities include providing continued mentoring, optimizing the use of writing-support technologies, and integrating project-based learning to ensure sustained mastery of scientific skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Abdullatif, A. M., Alsubaie, M. A., & Aldoughan, E. A. (2020). Exploring the Effects of Excessive Texting Through Mobile Applications on Students’ Technostress and Academic Writing Skills in the Arabic Language. IEEE Access, 8, 166940–166950. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024021

Anaktototy, K., Sekawael, M., Latief, M. R. A., & Bin-Hady, W. R. A. (2023). Beyond Linguistics: Exploring the Cognitive and Motivational Barriers to Essay Writing for Tertiary Students. International Journal of Language Education, 7(3), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i3.37070

Behzadi, P., & Gajdács, M. (2021). Writing a Strong Scientific Paper in Medicine and the Biomedical Sciences: A Checklist and Recommendations for Early Career Researchers. Biologia Futura, 72(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-021-00095-z

Compagnoni, R., Bove, G., & van Gaalen, R. C. M. A. (2019). A Practical Guide to Writing (and Understetanding) a Scientific Paper: Clinical Studies, Basic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research: A Practical Guide and Case Based Research Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_48

Darling, D. C., Pallant, A. J., Smith, K. M., & Wood, W. F. (2024). Student-centered approaches to breaking through scientific writing barriers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 53(5), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231X.2024.2373022

Kusumawati, T. R. D., Supeno, & Lesmono, A. D. (2020). Student Worksheet Based on Inquiry With Vee Map to Improve Writing Skills in Physics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012034

Laverty, G., Macleod, H., Davies, S. R., & Bremner, S. B. (2015). Developing Entrepreneurial Skills in Pharmacy Students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(7), 106. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe797106

Lu, S., & Lu, J. (2023). Immersive Teaching Enhancing Ability of Scientific Paper Writing: A Case Study in the Fields of Instrumentation and Measurement. In 2023 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMD60522.2023.10491023

Luan, N. M., Anh, V. T. H., & Duong, H. T. T. (2024). Exploration of Factors Causing Difficulties in Students’ Writing Skills. World Journal of English Language, 14(4), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n4p447

Nguyen, T. S., & Nguyen, H. B. (2020). Unravelling Vietnamese Students’ Critical Thinking and Its Relationship With Argumentative Writing. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 5972–5985. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082233

Nurkamto, J., Wijayanto, A., Marmanto, S., Drajati, N. A., Basuki, I., Triyoko, H., & Sumardi. (2024). A PLS-SEM Analysis of the Factors Behind Writer’s Block of EFL University Students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i1.70234

Palines, K. M. E., & Cruz, R. A. O.-D. (2021). Facilitating Factors of Scientific Literacy Skills Development Among Junior High School Students. LUMAT, 9(1), 546–569. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1520

Raj, T., & Al-Sharafi, M. I. (2022). Importance of Critical Thinking in the Education. World Journal of English Language, 12(3), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n3p126

Rawson, R. E., Blenkinsop, C. M., Ryan, M. A., & Rawson, E. C. D. (2005). Writing-Skills Development in the Health Professions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328015tlm1703_6

Stupans, I., McGuren, T., & Babey, A. M. (2016). Student Evaluation of Teaching: A Study Exploring Student Rating Instrument Free-Form Text Comments. Innovative Higher Education, 41(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-015-9328-5

Suntoro, A., Mustadi, A., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Hestiningsih, S. R. (2024). Needs Analysis of the Learning Object Repository Model for Scientific Writing Instruction in Higher Education. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 5(1), 640–649. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2024.v05i01.0302

Wright, K. L., Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2019). Writing-to-Learn in Secondary Science Classes: For Whom Is It Effective? Reading and Writing Quarterly, 35(4), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1541769

Yamin, M., Setiawan, S., & Anam, S. (2023). Enhancing Critical Thinking to Foster Students’ Analytical Capacity in Academic Writing. International Journal of Language Studies, 17(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7513369

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

Savitri, A. A., Prasetyo, R., Faturachman, G. F., Khusna, S. S., Dewantara, A. A., Claus, M. P., … Prianita, D. R. (2025). WORKSHOP KARYA ILMIAH DENGAN PENGUATAN REFERENSI DAN BIBLIOMETRIK PADA SISWA MTS AL-MU’MIN MUHAMMADIYAH TEMBARAK. Jurnal Abdi Insani, 12(11), 6102–6112. https://doi.org/10.29303/abdiinsani.v12i11.3101

Issue

Section

section editor